A naturalistic, 24-week, open-label, add-on study of vortioxetine in bipolar depression. / Dolaczenie wortioksetyny w terapii depresji w chorobie afektywnej dwubiegunowej ­ 24-tygodniowe, otwarte badanie naturalistyczne.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of vortioxetine in major depressive disorder has been evaluated in many studies. However, there is a lack of studies assessing vortioxetine in bipolar depression. METHODS: In 60 patients with bipolar depression, vortioxetine 10-20 mg daily was added to current mood stabilizing medication during 24-week, naturalistic, openlabel study. The most frequent mood stabilizers were lamotrigine, quetiapine, olanzapine, and valproates. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. Patients were classified as responding to vortioxetine when they achieved 1 or 2 points on the CGI-I scale at any stage of observation. The criterion of remission was defined as score 1 at the CGI-S. RESULTS: 73% of all patients (44/60) responded to vortioxetine and 52% (31/60) achieved clinical remission of depressive symptoms (in mean 8.97 ± 4.05 weeks). There were no significant associations between vortioxetine response/remission rates and: (1) the dose, (2) BD type, (3) clinical stage, (4) presence of rapid cycling, (5) history of psychotic symptoms, analyzed depressive symptoms, and (6) concomitantly used mood stabilizer. 4 patients (6.7%) stopped treatment due to adverse effects (nausea), and 7 patients (11.7%) discontinued treatment due to the phase switch. 14 patients (23%) experienced a loss of vortioxetine effectiveness after the initial response or remission. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate relatively high rates of response and remission during 24-week treatment in depressed bipolar patients receiving vortioxetine concomitantly with a mood stabilizer. This may indicate that vortioxetine added to a mood stabilizer may constitute an efficient and well tolerated therapeutic option in bipolar depression.

Vergence eye movements impairments in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

One of the most evaluated eye tracking tasks in schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD) are smooth pursuit eye movements. They rely on the maintenance of slowly moving object on the fovea. While most of the studies evaluated tracking of a target that moves in the fronto-parallel plane, only two assessed vergence eye movements (VEM), which relies on the pursuit of object that moves in depth. The aim of our study was to compare VEM performance in SZ and BD. We evaluated 28 SZ patients, 32 BD patients and 25 healthy controls (HC). Participants underwent thorough optometric examination before eye tracking task. VEM were measured with the use of infrared eye tracker and dedicated vergence stimuli generator. SZ patients showed higher mean break and recovery points of fusion and shorter correct tracking time than HC. BD individuals revealed tracking accuracy deficits and higher number of saccades than HC. Compared to BD, SZ patients showed decrease of maximal convergence and divergence. Moreover, they presented tracking accuracy deficits of non-dominant eye: altered eyes positioning error during convergence and divergence gain. Exploratory analysis revealed significant gender differences between groups in terms of binocular VEM parameters. In this study we have recognized pattern of eye movement disturbances differentiating abovementioned groups. SZ patients showed decreased vergence tracking range with shorter tracking time and impaired accuracy of non-dominant eye, while BD patients showed higher number of saccades with decreased tracking accuracy. Neuroimaging studies are necessary to identify neuronal underpinnings of VEM impairments in SZ and BD.

Vergence eye movements in bipolar disorder. / Ruchy wergencyjne w chorobie afektywnej dwubiegunowej.

OBJECTIVES: With respect to bipolar disorder (BD), previous research have demonstrated saccadic eye movements abnormalities, manifested mainly as an increase in reaction time (latency) in both prosaccadic and antisaccadic task. So far, there were no studies related to vergence eye movements in subjects with BD. Our primary aim was to evaluate vergence tracking performance in this clinical group. METHODS: 30 patients with BD in remission and 23 healthy controls were enrolled. Subjects underwent optometric examination where near point of convergence was measured by the use of Wolff Wand. Instrumented convergence measurements were performed using infrared eye tracker and dedicated vergence stimuli generator. RESULTS: BD patients presented significantly higher average error between eyes' convergence and convergence required to fixate the target and higher number of saccadic intrusions compared with healthy controls group. Principal component analysis performed on oculometric parameters revealed differences between BD patients and healthy controls. Significant correlations between the vergence disturbances and saccadic intrusions were found. CONCLUSIONS: BD patients showed the alterations of the vergence eye movements similar to the disturbances of eye movements in the fronto-parallel plane. While the abnormalities of vergence eye movements in some mental disorders have been reported, we have for the first time objectively measured this phenomenon in BD.